Friday, October 6, 2017

The courage required to utter any other stale quotation from the cant and convention of the moment

Continuing to mine The Thing: Why I am a Catholic by G.K. Chesterton, published in 1929.

The following passages seems relevant to our campus snowflakes today, crying that other people's opinions, knowledge and speech are physical threats to their safety; "literal" threats. Chesterton is speaking, in 1929, of the debasement of language and the meaning of words. We have seen this trend reach absurd heights today where children are steeped in the feel-good ethos of affirmation, self-esteem, and "everyone is a winner" and then seasoned with the postmodernist idea that words are as bad as wounds.
Any man living in complete luxury and security who chooses to write a play or a novel which causes a flutter and exchange of compliments in Chelsea and Chiswick and a faint thrill in Streatham and Surbiton, is described as "daring," though nobody on earth knows what danger it is that he dares. I speak, of course, of terrestrial dangers; or the only sort of dangers he believes in. To be extravagantly flattered by everybody he considers enlightened, and rather feebly rebuked by everybody he considers dated and dead, does not seem so appalling a peril that a man should be stared at as a heroic warrior and militant martyr because he has had the strength to endure it.

The dramatic critic of a Sunday paper, a little while ago, lashed himself into a frenzy of admiration for the "courage" of some dismal and dirty play or other, because it represented a soldier as raving like a hysterical woman against the cruelty of those who had expected him to defend his country. It may be amusing that his idea of courage should be a defence of cowardice. But it is the sort of defence of it that we have heard ten thousand times during the reaction after the War; and the courage required to utter it is exactly as great as the courage required to utter any other stale quotation from the cant and convention of the moment: such trifles as the absurdity of marriage or the sympathetic personality of Judas Iscariot. These things have become quite commonplace; but they still pretend to be courageous.

No comments:

Post a Comment