In the comments section to a sociology "study" purporting to show some finding conducive to the SJW narrative. The study was small, self-selected participants, ambiguously worded, not peer reviewed, not replicated etc. Basically worthless cognitive pollution. But the results were trumpeted loudly.
Lucy Walcott was having none of it.
Data? I can blow my nose and come up with better numbers than a non-representable and highly biased non-peer reviewed study.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment